Make The Right Move!

Responsive Advertisement

Thursday, March 3, 2022

Online Dating: Fibbing Common

Online Dating: Fibbing Common

Feb. 9, 2007 -- When it comes to online Geological dating, More people Skirt a bit when posting their height, weight, or age.

That's what Investigator Jeffrey Hancock, PhD, of Cornell University's department of communication, and his Boyfriend Investigators say they Recovered.

They Unnatural 80 online daters in New York City and Recovered that All but -- 81% -- fibbed in their online profiles about height, weight, and/or age.

The lies Broadly weren't whoppers, but they Besides weren't innocent mistakes, according to the daters' own confessions.

Basically, the daters Proven to make themselves Complete Skilled, but not Preposterously Skilled.

As Hancock's Squad put it, "participants balanced the Latent hostility Betwixt Coming into court as attractive as possible Spell Besides being perceived as honest."

The Cogitation appears in April's edition of Proceedings of Computer/Human Interactions.

True or False?

The daters were evenly Cut Betwixt heterosexual men and women.

They had posted profiles on at To the lowest degree one of 4 popular Geological dating web sites:, Yahoo Personals, American Singles, and Webdate.

First, the Investigators asked the daters how accurately they had Rumored their height, weight, and age in their online Geological dating profiles.

Next, the Investigators measured the daters' actual height and weight. They Besides checked the daters' age on their driver's licenses.

The Cogitation shows that weight was the All but common Skirt Agent, followed by height and age.

Here are the percentages of daters who didn't measure up to (or exceeded) their profiles:

Weight: All but 60% inaccurate by 5 or More poundsHeight: 48% inaccurate by More than Fractional an inchAge: All but 19% different from age on license

On average, the daters were 5 to 6 pounds heavier; a Tertiary of an inch different in height; and about 5 months different in age than their profiles claimed.

Despite their postings, the daters really were:

Weight: 20.4 pounds lighter to 35 pounds heavierHeight: 1.75 inches shorter to 3 inches tallerAge: 3 years Jr. to 9 years older.

Women tended to underreport their weight; men tended to inflate their height.

The daters Broadly knew they hadn't told the Accuracy, the Cogitation shows.

Noticeable or Not?

Most daters' online profiles weren't very far from reality.

That may be because the daters knew they would eventually meet Somebody Brass to Brass who had seen their profile.

"Many of these deceptions would be difficult to Observe Brass-to-face," write the Investigators.

But In that location were "a few extreme lies," Hancock's Squad says, including profiles of daters Profession a 35-pound difference, a three-inch height difference, or an 11-year age difference from reality.

Those cases are "rare but extreme lies" that would be "highly Inclined and Unforgettable" on a date, the Investigators write.

"This may be one reason that people believe lying is so rampant in online Geological dating, especially since these extreme lies are More likely to be circulated," say the Investigators.

No comments:

Post a Comment


Truth hurts! Nothing is perfect, life is messy. Relationship are complex. Outcomes are uncertain, people are irrational.


Contact Form


Email *

Message *