Make The Right Move!

Responsive Advertisement

Wednesday, March 2, 2022

Study: Men's 'Down Low' Sex Often Stereotyped

Study: Men's 'Down Low' Sex Often Stereotyped

June 15, 2005 -- Media attention has recently lighted on Manpower who Rich person Gender with Another Manpower "on the down low" (without Weighty their primary Distaff partner about Information technology). Now, researchers say the reality doesn't always match the stereotypes.

Mainstream coverage of down low, or DL, behavior has Oft Conspicuous the black community. For instance, author J.L. King's 2004 book On the Down Low: A Journey Into the Lives of "Straight" Black Men Who Sleep With Men hit The New York Times' best-seller list and was Conspicuous on Oprah Winfrey's TV Lecture show.

But the DL Besides exists in Another communities, as CDC researchers told the 2005 National HIV Prevention Conference in Atlanta.

'Misdirected Attention'

More than a Cardinal people in the U.S. are living with HIV, according to Some other report Given at the conference. Nearly Fractional (47%) are black, 34% are white, and 17% are Hispanic. Men account for about three-quarters of HIV cases. By risk Grouping, Manpower who Rich person Gender with Manpower represent the largest Universe living with HIV (45%) followed by high-risk heterosexual contact (27%).

New HIV infections are rising among blacks, women, and people who get the Computer virus Direct heterosexual contact, says the report.

"As a Club, we Demand to challenge our assumptions about why African-Americans, Manpower who Rich person Gender with Manpower, and Another Universes are at high risk for HIV," says Phil Wilson, executive director of the Black AIDS Institute, in a Word release.

"Broad labels like 'down low' and misdirected attention on Decreased subsets of the Universe do little to advance HIV Bar," he continues. "Instead, we Demand to Focal point on Reduction Ad hoc behaviors that place Some Manpower and women at Continuing risk."

Down Low Data

The CDC's R.J. Wolitski and colleagues Unnatural 455 Manpower from 12 cities. All of the Manpower Aforesaid they had Gender with Another Manpower and had had Unshielded anal Gender Inside the last year. The Manpower Besides Aforesaid they were HIV-negative or had not been Time-tested for HIV.

First, the Manpower were asked if they knew what "DL" meant and if Information technology Delineate them. Almost three-fourths knew the Condition; of those Manpower, More than a quarter (28%) Aforesaid they were on the down low.

Analyses showed that the Cogitation's black Manpower were All but likely to identify with the Condition, followed by Hispanics and whites. Men who called themselves gay were less likely to be on the DL than those who did not describe themselves as gay.

Men who Rich person Gender with Manpower on the DL are a "significant Nonage" of at-risk Manpower who Rich person Gender with Manpower, especially among blacks and Hispanics, say the researchers.

Risky Secrets

Many of the Manpower were at Sizable risk for Catching and Diffusing HIV, whether or not they were on the DL, say the researchers. They call for HIV Bar programs aimed Ad hocally at Manpower on the DL.

Two-thirds of the Manpower Aforesaid they had had Unshielded anal Gender with either a male or Distaff partner. Those Numbers were Mistakable for Manpower on the DL and those not on the DL. However, Manpower on the DL were More likely to Rich person had Unshielded anal Gender without knowing their partner's HIV Condition.

Men on the DL were Besides More likely to Rich person had Distaff Gender partners and to Rich person had Channel Gender. Most of the 49 Manpower Coverage Channel Gender Aforesaid they didn't always U.S.e a condom.

Only 18 Manpower Aforesaid a woman was their main Gender partner. Most (12 out of 18) Aforesaid that woman did not know that they were having Gender with Another Manpower.

No comments:

Post a Comment



Relationship

Truth hurts! Nothing is perfect, life is messy. Relationship are complex. Outcomes are uncertain, people are irrational.




Comments

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *